The Super-Kiss Debate: How David Corenswet Defied James Gunn to Create Superman's Most Human Moment

The Super-Kiss Debate: How David Corenswet Defied James Gunn to Create Superman's Most Human Moment

It takes guts to argue with James Gunn. Especially when you're playing Superman in his billion-dollar franchise reboot. But David Corenswet, the 32-year-old actor now forever etched as our generation's Man of Steel, knew something his director didn't about one crucial scene: The kiss wasn't working because it was missing laughter.

In a revealing Variety "Actors on Actors" interview with Jonathan Bailey, Corenswet dropped the Kryptonite-level bombshell: He and Gunn fundamentally disagreed about Superman and Lois Lane's climactic kiss — that magical, weightless moment that closes the film.

The Moment That Almost Wasn't

Picture the scene: Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) finally says "I love you too" to Superman after his heartfelt confession. They float above the city, the world saved, their feelings mutual. It's the perfect romantic payoff.

But according to Corenswet, Gunn wanted solemnity. A serious, profound moment befitting a god among men.

Corenswet pushed back: "No! The whole point is, I fucking know that you love me."

His insight was brilliant in its simplicity: Superman isn't surprised by Lois's love — he's delighted by it. That chuckle? That's the sound of a superhero who's been pining for this moment finally getting exactly what he wanted. It's relief, joy, and human connection all in one spontaneous laugh.

As Bailey perfectly observed: "That is what makes a leading man smash it out of the park."

The 90% Rule: When to Trust Your Director (And When to Fight)

Corenswet was careful to frame this disagreement within the larger context of his collaboration with Gunn:

"Credit to James. He was right on 90 percent of everything, but on that one, he saw that chuckle was a very truthful thing."

This is the golden ratio of actor-director collaboration. Ninety percent trust, ten percent healthy disagreement. Corenswet respected Gunn's vision enough to follow it most of the time, but knew his character well enough to fight for the 10% that mattered.

What's fascinating is that this isn't their first public disagreement. Remember the viral behind-the-scenes clip from August? Corenswet storms off set after clashing with Gunn over Superman's motivation in a scene with Lex Luthor. They argue passionately, Gunn says something that "clicks," and Corenswet returns to deliver the perfect take.

That footage sparked debates about their working relationship, but Corenswet clarifies: "I feel so lucky that that is on film."

Why This Matters More Than Just a Kiss

This isn't just Hollywood gossip. It reveals something crucial about how Superman was reimagined for 2025:

1. Humanity Over Divinity

Gunn's initial instinct — solemnity — treats Superman as a mythical figure. Corenswet's chuckle grounds him as a man in love. That's the entire thesis of this reboot: Superman isn't distant or alien; he's emotionally accessible.

2. Collaborative Filmmaking

Gunn screened over 400 actors for this role. He chose Corenswet not just for his look, but for his chemistry with Brosnahan and his willingness to engage creatively. Their arguments weren't dysfunction — they were creative friction producing sparks.

3. The New DCU Philosophy

Under Gunn's leadership, the DC Universe appears to value strong creative voices over obedient performers. Corenswet wasn't hired to be a puppet; he was hired to be a collaborator.

The Gunn-Corenswet Dynamic: Brutal Honesty Breeds Brilliance

Corenswet has been refreshingly candid about their unique working relationship:

"James has this habit of, as you're working on the scene, he'll sit back by the monitors on the God mic and he'll yell directions at you, which is not how directors generally work."

Most actors would find this intimidating. Corenswet found it liberating: "I desperately need a director."

Gunn, for his part, has joked about Corenswet's constant questions: "Every once in a while, it's just one question too many, and it's like, 'Oh, my God, just, David, stop, stop for a minute.'"

But he always follows with praise: "I appreciated his eagerness to help make the film as good as possible."

This is the ideal creative partnership: two perfectionists pushing each other toward excellence, even when it gets uncomfortable.

What This Means for "Man of Tomorrow"

The good news? This partnership continues. Corenswet and Gunn are already working on Superman: Man of Tomorrow, scheduled for July 2027.

If their first collaboration produced a critically acclaimed hit that reinvigorated the Superman franchise, imagine what they can achieve with established trust and chemistry.

The kiss disagreement suggests we might see even more nuanced character moments in the sequel. Corenswet has proven he understands Clark Kent's psychology at a deep level, and Gunn has proven he'll listen when an actor's instincts ring true.

The Bigger Picture: A New Era for Superhero Acting

For years, superhero films have been criticized for cookie-cutter performances and actors treated as replaceable parts in a CGI machine. The Gunn-Corenswet collaboration represents a potential shift:

• Actors as creative partners, not just hired talent

<!---->

• Character depth prioritized over spectacle

<!---->

• Emotional truth valued above all

When Jonathan Bailey praised Corenswet's "chuckle" as the moment of "chemistry" that made the kiss work, he identified exactly what separates this Superman from previous iterations: authentic human connection.

The Verdict: Who Was Right?

History has rendered its verdict: Corenswet's chuckle works. It's the moment audiences remember, the human touch that makes the god relatable.

But more importantly, the debate itself was right. Great art isn't made by yes-men. It's made by passionate creators who care enough to argue about whether Superman should chuckle when the woman he loves finally says she loves him back.

What do you think? Did the chuckle make the scene, or would solemnity have been more powerful? Have you ever had a creative disagreement that ultimately improved the final product? Share your thoughts in the comments — respectful debate is what makes art better!

Share this with a fellow Superman fan or anyone who appreciates the creative process behind great art.